Popularity of the name Oliver, 1880–2025
Oliver was at its most popular in 2024, when 15,396 boys were given the name: about 1 in 110 boys born in the U.S. that year, ranking #3. In 2025, 14,939 boys were named Oliver, ranking #3. In all, Social Security counts 269,903 boys named Oliver since 1880. Social Security’s records also list 777 girls named Oliver.
- Peak year
- 2024
- Rank in 2024
- #3
- Babies in 2024
- 15,396
- Rank in 2025
- #3
- Total since 1880
- 269,903
Where it stands now
In the past decade the name climbed from #19 in 2015 to #3 in 2025: 11,670 boys got it in 2015, and 14,939 in 2025.
Decade by decade
Its best decade is the 2020s so far, when 89,293 boys were named Oliver, #3 for the decade. It started at #76 in the 1880s.
Every 20 years in the records: 234 in 1880 (#69), 256 in 1900 (#95), 1,164 in 1920 (#135), 582 in 1940 (#215), 370 in 1960 (#410), 393 in 1980 (#414), 978 in 2000 (#305) and 14,277 in 2020 (#3).
Highs and lows
The most boys given the name in a single year was 15,396, in 2024. Its best rank in any year was #3, first reached in 2019.
Every year
The table lists every year from 1880 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 boys named Oliver, with the name’s rank that year.
| Year | Babies | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 1880 | 234 | #69 |
| 1881 | 238 | #67 |
| 1882 | 244 | #71 |
| 1883 | 219 | #72 |
| 1884 | 245 | #74 |
| 1885 | 258 | #72 |
| 1886 | 230 | #75 |
| 1887 | 203 | #80 |
| 1888 | 206 | #88 |
| 1889 | 210 | #83 |
| 1890 | 218 | #81 |
| 1891 | 212 | #77 |
| 1892 | 238 | #84 |
| 1893 | 214 | #85 |
| 1894 | 222 | #88 |
| 1895 | 216 | #88 |
| 1896 | 194 | #98 |
| 1897 | 174 | #102 |
| 1898 | 186 | #102 |
| 1899 | 161 | #107 |
| 1900 | 256 | #95 |
| 1901 | 187 | #92 |
| 1902 | 181 | #107 |
| 1903 | 210 | #92 |
| 1904 | 200 | #108 |
| 1905 | 211 | #102 |
| 1906 | 183 | #117 |
| 1907 | 207 | #117 |
| 1908 | 207 | #122 |
| 1909 | 246 | #112 |
| 1910 | 307 | #103 |
| 1911 | 333 | #115 |
| 1912 | 646 | #117 |
| 1913 | 644 | #124 |
| 1914 | 861 | #122 |
| 1915 | 1,131 | #119 |
| 1916 | 1,103 | #127 |
| 1917 | 1,175 | #127 |
| 1918 | 1,248 | #130 |
| 1919 | 1,209 | #128 |
| 1920 | 1,164 | #135 |
| 1921 | 1,194 | #135 |
| 1922 | 1,214 | #134 |
| 1923 | 1,221 | #136 |
| 1924 | 1,172 | #140 |
| 1925 | 1,049 | #151 |
| 1926 | 1,065 | #150 |
| 1927 | 1,002 | #157 |
| 1928 | 933 | #161 |
| 1929 | 886 | #163 |
| 1930 | 850 | #170 |
| 1931 | 778 | #175 |
| 1932 | 741 | #182 |
| 1933 | 595 | #198 |
| 1934 | 732 | #181 |
| 1935 | 647 | #197 |
| 1936 | 591 | #205 |
| 1937 | 609 | #200 |
| 1938 | 568 | #216 |
| 1939 | 598 | #203 |
| 1940 | 582 | #215 |
| 1941 | 601 | #219 |
| 1942 | 612 | #228 |
| 1943 | 668 | #217 |
| 1944 | 565 | #239 |
| 1945 | 558 | #239 |
| 1946 | 619 | #251 |
| 1947 | 624 | #271 |
| 1948 | 631 | #258 |
| 1949 | 597 | #271 |
| 1950 | 556 | #283 |
| 1951 | 552 | #293 |
| 1952 | 555 | #300 |
| 1953 | 521 | #314 |
| 1954 | 537 | #310 |
| 1955 | 508 | #327 |
| 1956 | 483 | #341 |
| 1957 | 452 | #358 |
| 1958 | 453 | #363 |
| 1959 | 370 | #413 |
| 1960 | 370 | #410 |
| 1961 | 349 | #425 |
| 1962 | 312 | #450 |
| 1963 | 357 | #427 |
| 1964 | 368 | #421 |
| 1965 | 303 | #445 |
| 1966 | 337 | #411 |
| 1967 | 291 | #444 |
| 1968 | 325 | #428 |
| 1969 | 328 | #437 |
| 1970 | 367 | #427 |
| 1971 | 416 | #395 |
| 1972 | 368 | #411 |
| 1973 | 374 | #403 |
| 1974 | 347 | #420 |
| 1975 | 355 | #406 |
| 1976 | 337 | #424 |
| 1977 | 338 | #431 |
| 1978 | 422 | #375 |
| 1979 | 408 | #396 |
| 1980 | 393 | #414 |
| 1981 | 403 | #409 |
| 1982 | 455 | #380 |
| 1983 | 435 | #384 |
| 1984 | 397 | #416 |
| 1985 | 371 | #442 |
| 1986 | 338 | #471 |
| 1987 | 460 | #405 |
| 1988 | 441 | #428 |
| 1989 | 460 | #439 |
| 1990 | 625 | #373 |
| 1991 | 582 | #389 |
| 1992 | 664 | #355 |
| 1993 | 665 | #355 |
| 1994 | 644 | #369 |
| 1995 | 597 | #393 |
| 1996 | 607 | #384 |
| 1997 | 669 | #367 |
| 1998 | 735 | #356 |
| 1999 | 782 | #340 |
| 2000 | 978 | #305 |
| 2001 | 978 | #299 |
| 2002 | 1,166 | #268 |
| 2003 | 1,375 | #245 |
| 2004 | 1,491 | #228 |
| 2005 | 1,794 | #209 |
| 2006 | 2,352 | #173 |
| 2007 | 2,910 | #140 |
| 2008 | 3,604 | #118 |
| 2009 | 4,287 | #98 |
| 2010 | 4,666 | #88 |
| 2011 | 5,414 | #78 |
| 2012 | 5,924 | #73 |
| 2013 | 7,276 | #52 |
| 2014 | 9,453 | #32 |
| 2015 | 11,670 | #19 |
| 2016 | 13,066 | #12 |
| 2017 | 13,224 | #10 |
| 2018 | 13,500 | #5 |
| 2019 | 13,967 | #3 |
| 2020 | 14,277 | #3 |
| 2021 | 14,713 | #3 |
| 2022 | 15,176 | #3 |
| 2023 | 14,792 | #3 |
| 2024 | 15,396 | #3 |
| 2025 | 14,939 | #3 |
How these numbers are counted
Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.
Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.