Skip to content

Popularity of the name Michelle, 1915–2025

Michelle was at its most popular in 1969, when 34,319 girls were given the name: about 1 in 49 girls born in the U.S. that year, ranking #2. In 2025, 661 girls were named Michelle, ranking #465. In all, Social Security counts 816,510 girls named Michelle since 1915. Social Security’s records also list 3,250 boys named Michelle.

Peak year
1969
Rank in 1969
#2
Babies in 1969
34,319
Rank in 2025
#465
Total since 1915
816,510
Babies named Michelle per 1,000 girls born, 1915–2025How many of every 1,000 girls born each year were named Michelle. The table below lists every year.06121824192019401960198020002020
Babies given the name per 1,000 girls born each year. A gap is a year with fewer than 5.

Where it stands now

In the past decade the name slipped from #192 in 2015 to #465 in 2025: 1,706 girls got it in 2015, and 661 in 2025.

Decade by decade

Its best decade was the 1970s, when 249,130 girls were named Michelle, #4 for the decade. It ranked #5,143 in the 1910s and #395 in the 2020s so far.

Every 20 years in the records: 9 in 1920 (#3,340), 92 in 1940 (#726), 9,893 in 1960 (#39), 19,119 in 1980 (#10), 5,545 in 2000 (#52) and 923 in 2020 (#336).

Highs and lows

The most girls given the name in a single year was 34,319, in 1969. Its best rank in any year was #2, first reached in 1968.

Every year

The table lists every year from 1915 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 girls named Michelle, with the name’s rank that year.

Babies named Michelle by year
YearBabiesRank
19155#4,274
19185#4,809
19197#3,817
19209#3,340
19229#3,379
19236#4,376
192411#2,973
192514#2,489
192611#2,872
192712#2,699
192810#2,954
192915#2,191
193013#2,425
193112#2,427
193210#2,831
193328#1,364
193424#1,518
193527#1,418
193629#1,345
193736#1,196
193855#955
193959#918
194092#726
1941133#612
1942233#482
1943370#373
1944405#341
1945499#307
1946755#263
1947914#248
19481,044#230
19491,248#213
19501,633#174
19512,133#151
19522,881#124
19533,631#107
19544,432#94
19554,526#97
19565,327#88
19575,982#79
19587,458#56
19598,776#47
19609,893#39
196112,741#34
196213,353#31
196314,383#26
196416,180#23
196516,215#18
196627,159#4
196730,827#3
196833,223#2
196934,319#2
197034,047#4
197133,160#2
197229,285#2
197326,935#3
197425,826#3
197522,665#6
197619,550#6
197719,540#7
197818,856#9
197919,266#10
198019,119#10
198117,781#11
198217,765#11
198316,838#13
198415,499#17
198513,973#22
198613,303#23
198713,034#21
198813,339#21
198913,376#22
199013,425#22
199112,213#22
199211,512#25
199310,193#31
19948,639#33
19957,392#41
19966,598#47
19975,695#55
19985,562#55
19995,303#56
20005,545#52
20015,033#59
20024,950#58
20034,873#62
20044,720#66
20054,312#74
20064,090#81
20073,596#94
20083,343#101
20093,078#104
20102,510#125
20112,180#144
20121,935#162
20131,892#168
20141,751#188
20151,706#192
20161,562#209
20171,429#215
20181,249#263
20191,144#292
2020923#336
2021799#394
2022827#377
2023766#401
2024775#409
2025661#465

How these numbers are counted

Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.

Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.