Skip to content

Popularity of the name Emma, 1880–2025

Emma was at its most popular in 1881, when 2,034 girls were given the name: about 1 in 45 girls born in the U.S. that year, ranking #3. In 2025, 12,754 girls were named Emma, ranking #3. In all, Social Security counts 776,439 girls named Emma since 1880. Social Security’s records also list 1,733 boys named Emma. Its peak falls in the earliest years of the records, and counts from before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a Social Security card.

Peak year
1881
Rank in 1881
#3
Babies in 1881
2,034
Rank in 2025
#3
Total since 1880
776,439
Babies named Emma per 1,000 girls born, 1880–2025How many of every 1,000 girls born each year were named Emma. The table below lists every year.0612182418801900192019401960198020002020
Babies given the name per 1,000 girls born each year. A gap is a year with fewer than 5.

Where it stands now

Over the last ten years it has slipped from #1 in 2015 to #3 in 2025, with 20,487 girls named Emma in 2015 and 12,754 in 2025.

Decade by decade

Emma ranked highest in the 2010s, at #1, with 195,070 girls given the name that decade. It ranked #3 in the 1880s and #2 in the 2020s so far.

Every 20 years in the records: 2,003 in 1880 (#3), 3,095 in 1900 (#13), 5,238 in 1920 (#46), 2,606 in 1940 (#94), 976 in 1960 (#297), 530 in 1980 (#416), 12,560 in 2000 (#17) and 15,723 in 2020 (#2).

Highs and lows

The most girls given the name in a single year was 22,719, in 2003. That is not its peak year: Social Security’s records hold more girls for 2003 than for 1881, so the name’s share of births was smaller. Its best rank in any year was #1, first reached in 2008.

Every year

The table lists every year from 1880 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 girls named Emma, with the name’s rank that year.

Babies named Emma by year
YearBabiesRank
18802,003#3
18812,034#3
18822,303#3
18832,367#3
18842,587#3
18852,728#3
18862,764#3
18872,647#4
18883,087#4
18892,884#5
18902,980#5
18912,884#5
18923,128#7
18932,968#9
18942,937#9
18952,952#10
18962,872#10
18972,698#10
18982,788#13
18992,445#13
19003,095#13
19012,374#17
19022,514#18
19032,308#23
19042,312#22
19052,298#26
19062,224#28
19072,356#27
19082,357#30
19092,338#34
19102,607#34
19112,616#35
19123,357#35
19133,474#38
19143,972#39
19155,044#40
19165,217#41
19175,121#46
19185,324#46
19195,087#45
19205,238#46
19215,072#52
19225,013#50
19234,977#53
19244,897#57
19254,714#57
19264,480#59
19274,327#64
19284,017#67
19293,803#69
19303,555#73
19313,307#76
19323,330#76
19333,152#75
19342,940#85
19352,802#89
19362,831#85
19372,750#89
19382,670#96
19392,685#89
19402,606#94
19412,546#99
19422,606#108
19432,422#114
19442,247#118
19452,052#123
19462,070#131
19472,141#141
19482,099#138
19491,999#147
19501,896#154
19511,731#174
19521,709#180
19531,590#195
19541,530#202
19551,460#211
19561,340#226
19571,217#243
19581,084#266
19591,056#270
1960976#297
1961892#307
1962798#331
1963724#352
1964770#343
1965640#359
1966619#364
1967564#385
1968494#426
1969516#426
1970529#421
1971474#442
1972453#428
1973419#447
1974490#408
1975477#422
1976414#463
1977479#423
1978442#450
1979488#428
1980530#416
1981534#412
1982560#410
1983551#398
1984678#341
1985947#263
19861,259#209
19871,589#175
19881,795#160
19891,938#149
19902,420#130
19912,595#123
19923,212#104
19934,108#80
19944,765#74
19955,050#67
19966,151#53
19977,749#36
199810,451#22
199911,751#17
200012,560#17
200113,327#13
200216,558#4
200322,719#2
200421,625#2
200520,362#2
200619,133#2
200718,390#3
200818,830#1
200917,910#2
201017,366#3
201118,825#3
201220,976#2
201320,973#2
201420,970#1
201520,487#1
201619,550#1
201719,873#1
201818,824#1
201917,226#2
202015,723#2
202115,549#2
202214,512#2
202313,590#2
202413,524#2
202512,754#3

How these numbers are counted

Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.

Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.