Skip to content

Popularity of the name Camila, 1914–2025

Camila was at its most popular in 2020, when 8,165 girls were given the name: about 1 in 200 girls born in the U.S. that year, ranking #11. In 2025, 6,591 girls were named Camila, ranking #19. In all, Social Security counts 123,854 girls named Camila since 1914. Social Security’s records also list 122 boys named Camila.

Peak year
2020
Rank in 2020
#11
Babies in 2020
8,165
Rank in 2025
#19
Total since 1914
123,854
Babies named Camila per 1,000 girls born, 1914–2025How many of every 1,000 girls born each year were named Camila. The table below lists every year.01.534.56192019401960198020002020
Babies given the name per 1,000 girls born each year. A gap is a year with fewer than 5.

Where it stands now

In the past decade the name climbed from #43 in 2015 to #19 in 2025: 5,275 girls got it in 2015, and 6,591 in 2025.

Decade by decade

Its best decade is the 2020s so far, when 45,999 girls were named Camila, #12 for the decade. It started at #4,333 in the 1910s.

Every 20 years in the records: 7 in 1920 (#3,957), 7 in 1960 (#5,168), 19 in 1980 (#3,992), 370 in 2000 (#659) and 8,165 in 2020 (#11).

Highs and lows

The most girls given the name in a single year was 8,165, in 2020. Its best rank, #11, came in its peak year.

Every year

The table lists every year from 1914 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 girls named Camila, with the name’s rank that year.

Babies named Camila by year
YearBabiesRank
19145#3,618
19158#3,134
19178#3,344
19188#3,512
19207#3,957
19219#3,400
192212#2,780
192310#3,125
19265#4,851
19276#4,286
19285#4,725
19335#4,218
19355#4,204
19386#3,847
19458#3,388
19477#4,345
19487#4,205
19506#4,738
19518#4,011
19525#5,563
19537#4,595
19547#4,655
19575#6,086
195810#3,925
195912#3,619
19607#5,168
19619#4,546
19627#5,293
196313#3,635
196410#4,355
19659#4,494
196611#3,959
196720#2,781
196813#3,789
196915#3,619
197012#4,492
197110#5,136
197218#3,404
197313#4,362
197420#3,313
197519#3,514
197619#3,540
197711#5,532
197816#4,242
197925#3,236
198019#3,992
198117#4,344
198220#3,898
198320#3,806
198417#4,318
198542#2,362
198635#2,724
198749#2,199
198854#2,131
198960#2,072
199074#1,892
199172#1,933
199296#1,600
1993111#1,447
1994133#1,277
1995122#1,346
1996152#1,186
1997232#875
1998261#815
1999349#659
2000370#659
2001443#576
2002636#454
20031,033#300
20041,154#288
20051,719#201
20061,962#180
20072,665#129
20083,847#83
20093,737#80
20104,307#61
20114,972#48
20124,791#48
20135,147#39
20145,220#41
20155,275#43
20166,054#32
20176,776#23
20187,508#18
20197,846#15
20208,165#11
20218,036#12
20228,001#12
20237,581#13
20247,625#11
20256,591#19

How these numbers are counted

Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.

Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.