Skip to content

Popularity of the name Brenda, 1897–2025

Brenda was at its most popular in 1950, when 20,799 girls were given the name: about 1 in 82 girls born in the U.S. that year, ranking #14. In 2025, 139 girls were named Brenda, ranking #1,525. In all, Social Security counts 608,478 girls named Brenda since 1897. Social Security’s records also list 2,119 boys named Brenda.

Peak year
1950
Rank in 1950
#14
Babies in 1950
20,799
Rank in 2025
#1,525
Total since 1897
608,478
Babies named Brenda per 1,000 girls born, 1897–2025How many of every 1,000 girls born each year were named Brenda. The table below lists every year.04812161900192019401960198020002020
Babies given the name per 1,000 girls born each year. A gap is a year with fewer than 5.

Where it stands now

Over the last ten years it has slipped from #805 in 2015 to #1,525 in 2025, with 349 girls named Brenda in 2015 and 139 in 2025.

Decade by decade

Brenda ranked highest in the 1950s, at #18, with 209,241 girls given the name that decade. It ranked #2,358 in the 1890s and #1,272 in the 2020s so far.

Every 20 years in the records: 32 in 1920 (#1,407), 5,442 in 1940 (#42), 23,963 in 1960 (#13), 2,648 in 1980 (#115), 1,898 in 2000 (#172) and 180 in 2020 (#1,261).

Highs and lows

The most girls given the name in a single year was 24,339, in 1957. That is not its peak year: Social Security’s records hold more girls for 1957 than for 1950, so the name’s share of births was smaller. Its best rank in any year was #11, first reached in 1961.

Every year

The table lists every year from 1897 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 girls named Brenda, with the name’s rank that year.

Babies named Brenda by year
YearBabiesRank
18977#1,263
19016#1,466
19035#1,792
19046#1,659
19058#1,420
19087#1,676
19108#1,773
19119#1,656
191217#1,297
191312#1,766
191415#1,740
191520#1,672
191623#1,581
191718#1,923
191828#1,497
191930#1,423
192032#1,407
192132#1,437
192244#1,160
192343#1,174
192444#1,188
192558#976
192655#1,004
192747#1,108
192854#1,015
192960#922
193063#916
193166#844
193295#694
193390#683
1934106#652
1935132#556
1936163#511
1937233#423
1938676#244
19392,756#86
19405,442#42
19416,332#41
19427,241#40
19438,435#35
19448,999#30
19459,203#29
194612,690#24
194715,830#21
194817,700#17
194920,543#13
195020,799#14
195121,717#14
195221,439#15
195320,122#18
195419,609#18
195519,114#18
195619,341#19
195724,339#13
195821,337#16
195921,424#16
196023,963#13
196123,781#11
196221,274#12
196319,611#15
196417,106#18
196515,060#23
196613,294#25
196711,479#31
19689,945#34
19698,989#38
19708,336#40
19717,160#43
19726,270#44
19735,379#53
19744,830#59
19754,236#67
19763,587#77
19773,151#91
19782,873#103
19792,769#112
19802,648#115
19812,721#112
19822,517#118
19832,431#120
19842,497#112
19852,385#122
19862,241#124
19872,150#129
19882,285#123
19892,272#132
19902,633#123
19912,634#120
19922,827#119
19932,885#114
19942,655#121
19952,610#119
19962,414#131
19972,159#148
19982,133#149
19991,979#160
20001,898#172
20011,737#189
20021,550#213
20031,443#228
20041,660#201
20051,661#209
20061,419#240
20071,232#280
2008968#343
2009780#406
2010735#426
2011546#532
2012561#538
2013439#643
2014384#729
2015349#805
2016340#840
2017294#910
2018258#1,007
2019236#1,069
2020180#1,261
2021198#1,207
2022189#1,269
2023177#1,292
2024212#1,140
2025139#1,525

How these numbers are counted

Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.

Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.