Skip to content

Popularity of the name Asher, 1880–2025

Asher was at its most popular in 2022, when 8,418 boys were given the name: about 1 in 210 boys born in the U.S. that year, ranking #20. In 2025, 7,456 boys were named Asher, ranking #28. In all, Social Security counts 111,227 boys named Asher since 1880. Social Security’s records also list 1,463 girls named Asher.

Peak year
2022
Rank in 2022
#20
Babies in 2022
8,418
Rank in 2025
#28
Total since 1880
111,227
Babies named Asher per 1,000 boys born, 1880–2025How many of every 1,000 boys born each year were named Asher. The table below lists every year.01.534.5618801900192019401960198020002020
Babies given the name per 1,000 boys born each year. A gap is a year with fewer than 5.

Where it stands now

In the past decade the name climbed from #82 in 2015 to #28 in 2025: 5,137 boys got it in 2015, and 7,456 in 2025.

Decade by decade

Its best decade is the 2020s so far, when 47,998 boys were named Asher, #22 for the decade. It started at #1,003 in the 1880s.

Every 20 years in the records: 6 in 1880 (#809), 16 in 1920 (#2,052), 13 in 1940 (#1,983), 12 in 1960 (#2,423), 66 in 1980 (#1,111), 346 in 2000 (#578) and 7,698 in 2020 (#32).

Highs and lows

The most boys given the name in a single year was 8,418, in 2022. Its best rank, #20, came in its peak year.

Every year

The table lists every year from 1880 to 2025 in which Social Security recorded at least 5 boys named Asher, with the name’s rank that year.

Babies named Asher by year
YearBabiesRank
18806#809
18816#781
18856#836
18867#758
18876#819
18905#994
18956#978
19105#1,589
19137#2,273
191412#1,868
191517#1,707
191616#1,849
191715#1,986
191815#2,073
191921#1,624
192016#2,052
192117#1,980
192224#1,545
192314#2,224
192416#2,043
192515#2,089
192615#2,074
192716#2,034
19289#2,843
192910#2,589
19306#3,592
19317#3,095
193218#1,716
193310#2,368
193414#1,932
193510#2,396
193615#1,801
193713#1,992
193811#2,185
193910#2,288
194013#1,983
19416#3,133
194210#2,386
194314#1,986
194413#1,988
194510#2,242
19467#2,919
19477#3,096
19489#2,608
194914#2,022
19507#3,021
195112#2,246
19528#2,875
195311#2,391
195411#2,449
19555#3,886
195611#2,497
195710#2,631
19589#2,818
195916#2,033
196012#2,423
196111#2,538
19629#2,848
19638#3,044
196415#2,114
19657#3,244
196614#2,132
196717#1,906
196816#2,030
196912#2,549
197016#2,293
197114#2,558
197220#2,020
197327#1,696
197424#1,886
197535#1,505
197634#1,572
197742#1,407
197847#1,326
197956#1,221
198066#1,111
198176#1,044
198267#1,115
198390#930
198472#1,054
198594#939
198684#1,008
198788#1,009
198872#1,189
198978#1,214
199095#1,096
1991105#1,055
1992125#961
1993129#945
1994149#886
1995142#931
1996188#775
1997213#729
1998247#686
1999312#601
2000346#578
2001415#529
2002478#484
2003626#411
2004895#335
20051,156#288
20061,369#252
20071,580#233
20081,906#206
20092,354#165
20102,863#138
20113,420#113
20123,560#108
20133,720#104
20144,333#92
20155,137#82
20165,525#71
20176,062#59
20186,879#47
20197,058#43
20207,698#32
20218,370#25
20228,418#20
20237,897#23
20248,159#20
20257,456#28

How these numbers are counted

Social Security publishes, for every year since 1880, how many babies of each sex were given each name, counting any name given to at least 5. A name’s rank is its place that year among names for the same sex, by number of babies. Names with the same count share a rank here, while Social Security’s own lists break ties alphabetically, so a rank can differ from theirs by a place or two. A name’s share is the number of babies given it divided by all babies of that sex in the data that year, and its peak is the year that share was highest. Shares rather than counts set the peak, because far more babies were born in some years than others: counting babies alone would pull nearly every name’s peak toward the 1946–1964 baby boom.

Source: the U.S. Social Security Administration’s national baby name data, from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S. A name is left out of a year when fewer than 5 babies of one sex got it, and counts before about 1937 are incomplete, because many people born then never applied for a card. See how Baby Boom builds its data. Figures may contain errors.